Wedding Plans Videos

TNT93535 (November 20th, 2008 @ 8:51 pm)

Thanks for proving you're clinically brain damaged. There was no nation here for the US to have violated. Same with Israel.palestine has never been a nation, pick up a history book and you'll see. In fact, there was never a people referred to as palestinian until 1965 when yassir arafat made it up and created the PLO to justify murdering jews.

StrawB2000 (November 20th, 2008 @ 8:20 pm)

I'm an Immigrant I lived in a socialist country, I came to this county in 1969 at an age of 19, I have lived and first hand experience socialism, that is exactly what Obama is selling to the American public right now. Obama reminds me of Adolf Hitler in his speech in Berlin, he too drew large crowds same as Obama, look what it brought Germany. Word Up America the change he promises you is socialism.

trenchnurse (November 20th, 2008 @ 3:25 pm)

Yes, and therein lies the fault in their logic. It has to be "consensual from both parties". The presence of the illegal immigrant is NOT CONSENSUAL with my nation. Simply calling them an "undocumented worker" doesnt change the crime; it only renames it. Thats the point Im making. It has nothing to do with marriage. Since when is treatment from any government official supposed to be "encouraging"? A bank teller might be rude to me, it doesnt give me the excuse to rob the bank!

Manceinion (November 20th, 2008 @ 2:01 pm)

Marriage is not, despite some religious beliefs, a certificate of the right to violate said spouse against her will. A marital union between man and woman has to be consensual from both parties which is why I call your analogy redundant. As for feeling that illegal immigration is 'tasteless', I used to agree to some extent. That is before one of my own tried to enter the United States legally. The treatment they were given was certainly tasteless and hardly encouraging.

lisalov4 (November 20th, 2008 @ 11:38 am)

the usa and israel are very similar counteries.each one violated a nation and grounded on their land a new countery. shame shame shame

trenchnurse (November 20th, 2008 @ 10:09 am)

One is an UNWELCOME VIOLATION of a woman's body, the other is an UNWELCOME VIOLATION of a nation. See the similarities? I find illegal immigration tasteless. Calling someone something else doesnt change the violation or the violator.

RexNunc (November 20th, 2008 @ 9:17 am)

You HAVE heard of the NAU, no? What borders are you referring to? Certainly not the old sovereign borders of The United States? You couldn't be referring to those borders, since they don't exist anymore.

TNT93535 (November 20th, 2008 @ 9:11 am)

Anybody with a functioning brain doesn't like pnko because pinko is a socialist RETARD!

RexNunc (November 20th, 2008 @ 7:01 am)

Who dosen't love Pinky? Pinky rules.

TNT93535 (November 20th, 2008 @ 3:46 am)

Nope, I'm not an open borders socialist. Therefore I am not an idiot.

Manceinion (November 20th, 2008 @ 12:19 am)

Two typos?

Manceinion (November 20th, 2008 @ 12:15 am)

Considering that many rapists are in fact husbands, often of the abused, your analogy is redundant not to mention tasteless.